LPG-US: Initiation (Neutral, TP 6.9)

Dorian LPG has a fleet of 22 modern Very Large Gas Carriers (VLGC) with four on long time charters and the rest by large exposed to the current lackluster spot market. Recent corporate actions highlights the continued necessity of shoring up the balance sheet and ensuring liquidity as we await the cyclical upturn, which we pencil in from 2018E. Although we are positive on the sector outlook, we initiate coverage with a Neutral recommendation and a target price of USD 6.9 (-9%) due to the relatively high cash and P&L break-even levels. Dorian LPG is in our view priced ahead of peers Avance Gas (BUY, TP 28) and BW LPG (BUY, TP 37) in terms of both NAV and earning multiples.

Valuation: We calculate a NAV of USD 12.3/sh (P/NAV 0.62), with one year forward NAV of  USD 14.9/sh assuming asset prices rise ~10%. Our target price of USD 6.9/sh is based on a weighted average of current/future NAV and mid-cycle earnings multiples in 2018/19E.

p1

Market overview:  Before the paradigm shift in 2014/15, LPG shipping on Very Large Gas Carriers (VLGC) had more industrial properties than today. The market was characterized by less spot activity, the Middle East as the main exporter and LPG prices primarily set to clear the market (supply driven). The US shale oil/gas boom, the collapse in oil prices and the massive expansion of US LPG export facilities have subsequently led to a market which is more spot cargo driven and dependent on the price differential between US and Asian energy prices being high enough for deep sea shipments of US LPG to make economically sense.

After enjoying super profits in 2014/15, VLGCs earnings collapsed under the weight of an extraordinary fleet growth from 164 vessels at the start of 2015 to 250 vessels today (CAGR of 19%), whereas demand has not kept up despite massive new US export capacity having de-bottlenecked the global trade. Lower global energy prices have also affected tonne-mile demand negatively, in concert with the expansion of the Panama Canal in mid-2016. Thus, we see two constraints that needs to be corrected before earnings once again can return to normalized levels and beyond: 1) The increase in global energy prices and 2) the reduction in the current tonnage oversupply.

The US rig count has risen 127% from the trough in mid-2016, representing increased present and future US shale oil and gas production. Hence, it is likely that excess LPG in the US will increase and prices will drop, increasing the LPG price differential vs the Far East, all else equal. However, the flip side of increased US production is lower global energy prices and thus lower LPG price differential. The optimal scenario would be high global energy prices and high shale production in the US, but this is not a base case scenario in our view. An increased LPG price differential is pivotal for making LPG shipments on VLGCs economical viable, with current theoretical TCE rates at USD -7k/d (vs USD 120k/d at the peak in mid-2014). Based on the current Brent crude oil futures curve, and assuming unchanged US LPG prices, we estimate VLGC rates below USD 10k/d until 2020E. However, elevating the futures curve by a mere USD 10/bbl to around USD 60/bbl enables theoretical VLGC rates around USD 40-50k/d. This shows how sensitive spot rates are to global energy prices. Overall, we forecast demand growth of 6% in 2017E, 8% in 2018E and 6% in 2019E (vs 6% average since 1999) based the new US export capacity coming online, a small increase in global energy prices and unchanged or falling US LPG prices.

In terms of supply growth, we are still seeing deliveries from the massive contracting during the 2014/15 super-cycle (current gross orderbook at 13% vs fleet). Given the lacklustre earnings and 17 vessels older than 30 years (6% of fleet), it would be natural to see significant scrapping at this point. However, we have only seen two vessels sent to the beaches over the past year, but we still believe scrapping to pick up going forward. Nevertheless, zero newbuildings have been contracted over the past year, thus laying the foundation for the next expansionary phase in the cycle. We forecast net supply growth of 12% in 2017E, 3% in 2018E and 1% in 2019E.

In sum, we expect utilization to trough at 73% in 2017E, recover to 77% in ’18E and rise to 81% in ‘19E. This equates to average VLGC spot rates of USD 13k/d in 2017E, USD 18k/d in ‘18E and USD 25k/d in ‘19E.

VLGC slide pack

Company specifics:

c1c2c3c4

Market fundamentals:

m1m2m3m4m5

 Disclaimer: The publisher currently has no investments in the company
This entry was posted in LPG shipping, shipping, VLGC and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to LPG-US: Initiation (Neutral, TP 6.9)

  1. Johan says:

    A very general question. When you calculate NAV’s of shipping companies. Do you have access and use VesselValue or any other service to get an up to date value of these? Even with that it is difficult with the LPG sector that has such small second hand market but my question also relates when you do work with dry bulk and clean/dirty tankers.

  2. We look to recent S&P transactions, and compare them to several first hand broker valuation suggestions for next done and thus make up our mind on the current fair value on a generic ship. We have also included assumptions on forward valuation based on the econometric relationship between 1 year timecharter contracts (one year forward earnings) and vessel values (usually R2>0.9 over the past 20 years). Of course, LPG/ethylene vessels are harder to value than dry bulk. We do not use VesselValue.

    I hope this answers your question.

  3. Bobby says:

    Hi, two important element which are crucial and could be added to the current template for analysis are:
    -presentation of management and main shareholders. The shipping world is full of colourful characters who are not always the most honest. Public companies also often have a main shareholder who has a private arm which leads to interesting/dubious cross-trades.
    -analysis of the debt stack : seniority/coupons/maturity profile. Shipping companies have similar issues to bank : liquidity and solvency. Their financing is a crucial part of their success.

  4. admin says:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *